tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8604537836229985815.post8282062334643091880..comments2023-03-13T06:50:31.743-07:00Comments on Triviū, Quadriviū, 7 cætera: Rectifying a Grammatical Error with Theological ImplicationsHans Georg Lundahlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01055583255516264955noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8604537836229985815.post-40899128066494452382012-11-03T09:01:43.891-07:002012-11-03T09:01:43.891-07:00Of course one English scholar has made a lot of &q...Of course one English scholar has made a lot of "equivalences" between theses endorsed by St Thomas Aquinas and such condemned by Stephen II Tempier. When in fact they are not equivalent.<br /><br />For instance it is one thing to say that if a mind is at one moment totally absorbed in contemplating something (true or false, sensual or spiritual, whatever), the will necessarily choses it (position of St Thomas) and quite another to say that what the mind still truly believes the will certainly choses (position condemned by Stephen II Tempier).Hans Georg Lundahlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01055583255516264955noreply@blogger.com