tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8604537836229985815.post7017020441524340474..comments2023-03-13T06:50:31.743-07:00Comments on Triviū, Quadriviū, 7 cætera: F = GMm / R^2Hans Georg Lundahlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01055583255516264955noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8604537836229985815.post-6511978493117025602012-11-03T02:28:26.496-07:002012-11-03T02:28:26.496-07:00Actually no. The difference of masses between Sun ...Actually no. The difference of masses between Sun as given and Moon as given and the number of Moon masses per Sun mass I calculated is more than 10:1. That should mean a difference of 10:1 in gravitational pull also.Hans Georg Lundahlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01055583255516264955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8604537836229985815.post-59527706360859758282012-11-02T10:23:17.280-07:002012-11-02T10:23:17.280-07:00I worked out mass relations between Sun and Moon a...I worked out mass relations between Sun and Moon according to French wiki, and it makes the Sun<br /><b>2 million 700 sth thousand times as massive</b>.<br /><br />Either one calculation is wrong or there is a discrepancy between tides and the other ways of calculating their relative masses.<br /><br />Or the not quite equality in gravitational pull gives that great a discrepancy? Is that Mathematically possible?HGLnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8604537836229985815.post-20356627360927413692012-11-02T09:48:15.372-07:002012-11-02T09:48:15.372-07:00It would then seem that the Sun is
497 point 8 tim...It would then seem that the Sun is<br /><b>497 point 8 times as far away</b> <br />as the Moon in a mean, and that the Sun's mass would be square that number as many masses of the Moon,<br /><b>i e 247 thousand 804 point 84 times as massive.</b><br /><br />I calculated from a mean distance of 149,098,261 km of Sun to Earth and from a mean distance of 384,990 km of Earth to Moon.<br /><br />In the video it is said that sun may have less mass than earth, but if moon is 1/81 of earth's mass that would not be so.<br /><br />My solution for Geocentrism, without excluding Sungenis' is that masses are not all there is to it, see above, his is that the Sun and Earth would indeed behave Heliocentrically if alone in the Universe, but as they are not ... his solution is basically that the Universe circulates around a hollow without any significant mass, but that by Divine choice earth is upheld in that hollow and would immediately be pressed back to its place if trying to move.HGLnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8604537836229985815.post-91612969630347259632012-11-02T02:16:19.928-07:002012-11-02T02:16:19.928-07:00When going over the formula after writing, I concl...When going over the formula after writing, I concluded that:<br /><br />GMsm / R(s)^2 = GMmnm / R(mn)^2<br /><br />reduces to:<br /><br />M(s)= M(mn)R(s)^2 / R(mn)^2<br /><br />always supposing of course the current gravitational explanation of tides being the right one.<br /><br />One should also for the "=" read the curvy variant (approximately equal to).HGLhttp://triv7quadriv.blogspot.fr/2012/04/why-do-some-christian-people-find-my.htmlnoreply@blogger.com